Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv04755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type: Civil Rights Both
YANG MING (AMERICA) CORP. v. TRANSPORTATION SPECIALISTS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02021
Plaintiff: YANG MING (AMERICA) CORP.
Defendant: TRANSPORTATION SPECIALISTS, INC., ARNOLD M. GRISHAM, XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
BAZARAL v. THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2009cv00828
Plaintiff: NATALIE BAZARAL
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAYMOND M. QUICK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RUSSO et al v. GILLIS et al
as 3:2008cv06155
Plaintiff: JULIUS RUSSO and CAROL RUSSO
Defendant: ALLEN GILLIS, MIKADE DELIVERY SERVICES, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
BENDY v. BRUNO
as 3:2008cv04273
Plaintiff: MARK ANTHONY BENDY, SR.
Defendant: SHIELA BRUNO and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVITO et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2008cv04069
Plaintiff: JOHN DEVITO and MEGHAN DEVITO
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN, TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD, BENEFIT CONCEPTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03493
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00308
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?