Cases filed in New York
Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Hermes International et al v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2012cv01623
Plaintiff: Hermes International and Hermes of Paris, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
GED Testing Service LLC. et al, v. Amjad Pervaiz, et al
as 1:2012cv01157
Plaintiff: GED Testing Service LLC and American Council on Education
Defendant: Amjad Pervaiz, AZM Technologies, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Burberry Limited et al v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2012cv00479
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited
Defendant: John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Brown v. O'Hare et al
as 9:2012cv00042
Plaintiff: Gregory V. Brown
Defendant: Michael J. O'Hare , Kelly M. Bedore , David J. Norcross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. 44 Pct. In the Bronx John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2012cv00083
Plaintiff: Gilroy Johnson
Defendant: 44 Pct. In the Bronx John Doe #1, 44 Pct. In the Bronx John Doe #2, 44 Pct. In the Bronx John Doe # 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez et al v. Sepiol et al
as 1:2011cv01017
Plaintiff: Eddie Gomez, Olga Padilla and Elizabeth Padilla
Defendant: Stanley Sepiol, A. Mucigrosso, A. Fusare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colaruotolo v. Schenectady County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2011cv00720
Plaintiff: Kyle David Colaruotolo
Defendant: Schenectady County Jail, Schenectady County Sheriff's Department, County of Schenectady, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03096
Plaintiff: Ivelisse Castillo and Jeffery Figueroa
Defendant: City of New York , New York City Police Department, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv09570
Plaintiff: Ricardo A. Rodriguez
Defendant: The City of New York , New York City Police Department , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv05611
Defendant: Aleksander Afanasyev, Amega Inc., Betty Andresol and others
Plaintiff: Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Indentity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Viss Supply, Inc: John Doe 1
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of West Coast, Inc: John Doe 10
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Chesteron, Inc: John Doe 11
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Tita Co: John Doe 12
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Bilt-Rite Orthopedics & Safety, Inc: John Doe 13
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Wellcore Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 14
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Galasa, Inc: John Doe 15
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Eco Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 2
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Mikos Trading, Inc: John Doe 3
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of MDSS Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 4
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Excell Plus, Inc: John Doe 5
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Riviera Wholesale, Inc: John Doe 6
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Optom Inc: John Doe 7
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of Delazoom, Inc: John Doe 8
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of New Step Services, Inc: John Doe 9
Identity Not Presently Known But Intended To Be The Owner Of John Doe Corporations 1-10: John Does 16-25
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?