Cases 81 - 90 of 4,219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BLAYLOCK v. STARKE et al
as 1:2023cv03606
Plaintiff:
DAN M BLAYLOCK
Defendant:
PETRA SMELTZER STARKE, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TADESSE v. OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Defendant:
OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY, JOHN L. BARLOW, STUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
HEWA KODIPPILIGE v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03573
Plaintiff:
ACHINI HEWA KODIPPILIGE
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DOUG SONNEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOE v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03790
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
