Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Florentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv06783
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, DOES, Wai Chiu R. Li and others
Plaintiff:
Florentina Demuth
Alonzo et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv06427
Plaintiff:
Grace Acuna, Guadalupe Acuna, Abel Alonzo and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does and The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
Damion L. Richardson v. Keith Kanouse et al
as 2:2010cv05999
Defendant:
Lt. Xavier Aguilar, Lee Baca, Lee Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Damion L. Richardson
Jose Guardado v. Los Angeles Superior Court et al
as 2:2010cv02873
Defendant:
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., DOES, Dorsey & Whitney LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Guardado
A Division Of Its Parent Company Prospect Mortgage, LLC:
Quality Loan Services, LLC
An Affiliate Of Citigroup Global Market Inc:
Series 2007-OPXI
A Division Of Its Parent Company US Bancorp:
US Bank N.A.
David L Tomblin v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv02450
Defendant:
Danilo R Castaneda, Jr, County of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
David L Tomblin
Alison Kelleghan v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv08458
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, County of Los Angeles, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Kelleghan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Santiago Ibarra Rivera v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv01861
Defendant:
John A. Clarke, County of Los Angeles, County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Ibarra Rivera
Mary Amador et al v. Leroy D. Baca et al
as 2:2010cv01649
Plaintiff:
Mary Amador and Lorna Mallyon
Defendant:
Sherifff Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark and others
Ricardo Gonzalez v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2010cv01100
Defendant:
Deputy Michael Chaccon, Deputy James Gideon and NMI Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
