Cases 81 - 90 of 237
Mitchell v. Foxwell et al
as 8:2017cv00976
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Mitchell, II
Respondent:
Ricky Foxwell and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff:
Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donati v. Drummond et al
as 8:2016cv03293
Plaintiff:
Donati E. Michael
Defendant:
Drummond, Joseph, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Mitchell
as 8:2016cv03274
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Burns, Sr.
Defendant:
Lynndolyn Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mua v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al
as 8:2016cv03267
Plaintiff:
Josephat Mua
Defendant:
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al., Marsden & Seledee, The O'Neal Firm, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2016cv03172
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mitchell v. Medical Department
as 8:2016cv03035
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitchell
Defendant:
Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Mitchell
as 1:2016cv03017
Plaintiff:
Barry Lee
Defendant:
Michell B. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
