Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Martin v. Rush et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Norris Allen Martin
Defendant:
F Emory Rush, Michael R Culler, Jr, Jack Colman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loftus et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Patrick W Loftus, Jr , Andrew S Johnson and J Edward Norris
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plantation Federal Bank Salary Continuation Agreement, Plantation Federal Bank Split Dollar Agreement and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lyles v. Fields
as 7:1983dv01726
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lyles
Defendant:
Andrew Norris Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Norris v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 1:2012cv02592
Plaintiff:
Karron Norris
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singletary v. Norris et al
as 5:2012cv02384
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Singletary
Defendant:
Joey Norris, Joyce Brunson, Tressa Henneghai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coaxum v. Crothall Healthcare Inc
as 3:2012cv01644
Plaintiff:
Norris Coaxum
Defendant:
Crothall Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris v. Moore et al
as 8:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Dr Moore, Dr Lewis, Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Helems
as 5:2012cv01078
Plaintiff:
Hampton P Bradshaw
Defendant:
James Helems, Arlette Jones, B Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 5:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis Freeman, II
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Major Norris, Captain Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Norris et al
as 5:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Montez Myiharell Barker
Defendant:
Joey Norris, Joyce W Brunson and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
