Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Chambiss v. Clarke
as 2:2013cv00386
Petitioner:
Nathan P. Chambiss
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00005
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nathan Paul Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HALL v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Tonita Louise Hall
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Eric Holder, Albert L. Lord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
Noah Nathan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc , Louis Savant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Louis v. Lee et al
as 1:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Louis
Defendant:
Nathan Curtis Lee, Elbert D Mumphrey and Sam Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Johnson et al
as 7:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathan Caldwell
Defendant:
Octavia Johnson and Roanoke City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baber et al v. County of Frederick, Virginia et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Scott Baber, Kim C. Bohrer, Jeffrey S. Bowerman and others
Defendant:
County of Frederick, Virginia, Frederick County Sheriff's Office, John R. Riley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Call v. Harrison, Jr. et al
as 5:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Timothy Call
Defendant:
Nathan Harrison, Jr. and Williamson Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
