Cases 81 - 90 of 240
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2018cv00869
Defendant:
Board of Regents of New Mexico State University and Gavin Clarkson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02451
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Wu v. Seidlitz et al
as 1:2018cv00813
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Aden Seidlitz, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Liming Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Romero v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00801
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Officer R. Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner:
Felix G. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morrell v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00800
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, FNU Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner:
Frank R. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guttman v. New Mexico State Police et al
as 1:2018cv00661
Defendant:
New Mexico State Police, Jerry Delgado and Kevin Smith
Plaintiff:
Jessica Guttman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patton v. Downs at Albuquerque, Inc., et al.
as 1:2018cv00628
Defendant:
New Mexico State Fair, Downs at Albuquerque, Inc.,, Expo New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Frances Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirk v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
James Thor Kirk
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, New Mexico State Police , University of New Mexico Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gianardi v. New Mexico State Investment Council
as 1:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Anita Gianardi
Defendant:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Carrillo-Ortiz v. New Mexico State Police et al
as 1:2018cv00334
Plaintiff:
Francisco Agustin Carrillo-Ortiz
Defendant:
New Mexico State Police , Rafael Gomez , Toby LaFave and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
