Cases 81 - 90 of 229
Owaiian Jones v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 15-7655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALL, The, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, FBI and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Virginia State Police et al
as 1:2015cv01119
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Virginia State Police, Virginia State Police Superintendent and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2015cv01120
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01118
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hilton et al
as 1:2015cv01116
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Charles Hilton, Leonie Brinkema, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Synan et al
as 1:2015cv01031
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Synan, Mark Murphy, Julian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00534
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department Of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 15-6321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, ANGELONE, JOSEPH HIGGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
