Cases 81 - 90 of 158
Joseph Gilbert v. James Yates, et al
as 11-15576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, WILLIAM F. ALVAREZ, Ph.D., Health Care Manager, Pleasant Valley State Prison, JOHN G. DIEP, M.D., Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Johnson v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Leonard Johnson
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley State Prison, California Department of Corrections, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Leyva v. James Yate
as 10-56886
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD RENE LEYVA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Pleasant Valley State Prison Warden
Jose Iniguez v. James Yate
as 10-56451
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE A. INIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Pleasant Valley State Prison Warden
Cesar Hernandez v. James Yate
as 10-56421
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR NOEL HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A YATES, Warden Pleasant Valley State Prison
Carl Vallier v. James Yate
as 10-56264
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL ANTHONY VALLIER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden, Pleasant Valley State Prison
Vinh Nguyen v. James Yate
as 10-56080
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINH NGUYEN, A person
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison
Perez, et al v. State of California, et al
as 1:2010at00446
Plaintiff:
Tina Perez, Connie Garcia, Odisy Janas and others
Unknown:
Roseanne Cortez
Defendant:
State of California , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milos Klvana v. Warden of Pleasant Valley St, et al
as 10-55718
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILOS KLVANA
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
