Cases 81 - 90 of 92
United States of America v. One Residential Property Located at 9264 Palomino Ridge Drive, Lakeside, California
as 3:2009cv02350
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Residential Property Located at 9264 Palomino Ridge Drive, Lakeside, California
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Thomas Mackey v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mackey
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Gary Penrod, Gary Penrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO et al v. Palomino et al
as 4:2009cv01589
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO, Trustees of the Northern California Tile Industry Pension Trust and others
Defendant:
John Loney Palomino, American Contractors Indemnity Company and Surety Company of the Pacific
Cross-claimant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cross-defendant:
John Loney Palomino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Gutierrez et al v. Advanced Medical Optics Inc
as 8:2008cv01130
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Optics Inc
Plaintiff:
Felipa Gonzalez Coronado, Angelica Aldana Esparza, Francisca Palomino Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Apodaca Promotions, Inc. v. Vilma Diaz et al
as 2:2008cv06393
Plaintiff:
Apodaca Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Vilma Diaz, Rocio Pineda, Manuel Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO et al v. Palomino et al
as 3:2008cv03473
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO, Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO, Trustees of the Northern California Tile Industry Pension Trust and others
Defendant:
John Loney Palomino and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Danto Palomino v. Warden
as 2:2007cv04769
Petitioner:
Danto Palomino
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
