Cases 81 - 90 of 345
Peters v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 2:2019cv00874
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff:
Laura Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridges et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02310
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Morales, Carol Einhorn, Francisco Mantua and others
Defendant:
Sicor, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Snow Covered Capital, LLC v. Weidner et al
as 2:2019cv00595
Plaintiff:
Snow Covered Capital, LLC
Defendant:
David Samuel Jacoby, William Peter Weidner, Andrew Scott Fonfa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jensen v. Dzuranda et al
as 3:2019cv00178
Defendant:
James Dzuranda, Damon Bell, William Gitter and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helfrich v. CQV Trust, et al
as 2:2019cv00524
Respondent:
Stephen F. Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, David Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Jason Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shull v. Roseman University et al
as 2:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Nevada Commission On Postsecondary Education, Nevada Commission On Ethics, Roseman University and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Shull, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
D'Arcy v. Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00025
Defendant:
William J. Sherlock, Shawn W. Kravetz, Rudolph K. Kluiber and others
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy
Sharma v State of Arizona
as 2:2018cv02086
Plaintiff:
Peter Sharma
Defendant:
State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharma v. State of Arizona
as 2:2018cv02087
Plaintiff:
Peter Sharma
Defendant:
State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.