Cases 81 - 90 of 104
SCOTT v. CFCF et al
as 2:2012cv07200
Plaintiff:
TYRONE E. SCOTT
Defendant:
CFCF, H.O.C., PRISON COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOFTON v. C.F.C.F. et al
as 2:2012cv07193
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LOFTON
Defendant:
C.F.C.F., H.O.C., PRISON COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Reberger v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 12-17453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden, D. NEVEN, RENEE BAKER and others
MOORE v. C.F.C.F. et al
as 2:2012cv05764
Plaintiff:
LYNEL MOORE
Defendant:
C.F.C.F., H.O.C., THE WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00506
Defendant:
Carson City, City of, Clark, County Of, Mary Holthus and others
Plaintiff:
Renard Truman Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodge v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00478
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Board of Prison Commissioners, Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
as 3:2012cv00433
Defendant:
Clark, County of, Mary Holthus, Lake Township and others
Plaintiff:
Renard Truman Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Reyes et al
as 2:2012cv01261
Defendant:
Daniel Angus, Robert Bannister, Cheryl Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Percy Lavae Bacon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reberger v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2012cv00296
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bruce R Bannister, R. Bruce and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Johnson v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 11-17428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ROSS MILLER, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
