Cases 81 - 90 of 101
STROMAN v. THALER
as 1:2010cv01017
Plaintiff:
EUGENE VAN STROMAN
Defendant:
RICK THALER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TISDALE v. THALER et al
as 1:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
LANCE WILLIAM TISDALE
Defendant:
RICK THALER and JOHN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRAYTON v. THALER
as 1:2010cv00342
Plaintiff:
LEE D. CRAYTON
Defendant:
RICK THALER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARRINO v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2009cv02042
Plaintiff:
TONY BARRINO
Defendant:
HEIDI COLLINS, RICK SANCHEZ, SUZANNE MALVEAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAN VALIN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 1:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
SCOTT VAN VALIN, KEN DOLE, RICK BIERMAN and others
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JANE LUBCHENCO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HAINEY v. RICKS et al
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY MCBRIDE HAINEY
Defendant:
KARINA E. RICKS, ALICE KELLY, REGINALD P. BAZILE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEWDOW et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2008cv02248
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWDOW, ELLERY SCHEMPP, MEL LIPMAN and others
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, JR., PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL COMMITTEE, JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01506
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
VALIN et al v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 1:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
SCOTT VAN VALIN, KEN DOLE, LARRY MCQUARRIE and others
Defendant:
CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, CONRAD C. LAUTENBACHER, JR. and JAMES W. BALSIGER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BEARD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
RICK BEARD
Defendant:
SIDNEY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
