Cases 81 - 90 of 200
Riddick v. Barton et al
as 7:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. Douglas Barton, Unit Manager Larry Collins, C/O C. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Mullens et al
as 7:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
C/O C. Mullens, Unit Manager Larry Collins, Sgt. B. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. White
as 1:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
Garth Daniel Richmond, II
Respondent:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neville v. Ballad Health System, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Montario Neville
Defendant:
Ballad Health System, Inc., Jonathan Clark, Christy G. McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. White et al
as 7:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deonta Jerome Hicks
Defendant:
Rick White, Clarke and Keith Almarode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoehn v. White et al
as 7:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Vito Antonio Hoehn
Defendant:
Rick White, Shannon Fuller, J. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Kevin Antonio Watson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Rick White and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Devon Harris
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jerad M. Ross
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, The Virginia Dept. of Corr., Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
