Cases
Cases 81 - 88 of 88
Citizens For Sanity.Com, Inc. et al v. Van Antwerp et al
as 8:2007cv01106
Plaintiff: Citizens For Sanity.Com, Inc., Citizens For Sanity.Com, Inc., Citizens For Sanity.Com, Inc. and others
Defendant: Robert L. Van Antwerp and Dale Hall
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00979
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00972
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PRESTON M. GEREN, III and ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Van Antwerp et al
as 9:2007cv80444
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., National Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant: Robert L. Van Antwerp and Pete Geren
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. Elk Run Coal Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1355
Plaintiff - Appellee: OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY
Party-in-Interest: COAL MAC, INCORPORATED
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CARL A. STROCK, Commander and Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM BULEN, Colonel (pty), District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District and others
Intervenor/Defendant: MINGO LOGAN COAL COMPANY
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant: ARACOMA COAL COMPANY, ELK RUN COAL COMPANY, ALEX ENERGY, INCORPORATED and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant: ALABAMA COAL ASSOCIATION, ALASKA MINERS ASSOCIATION, COAL OPERATORS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED and others
State of Georgia et al v. The United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2007cv00251
Plaintiff: State of Georgia, State of Georgia, State of Georgia and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Atlanta Regional Commission, City of Atlanta, City of Gainesville, Georgia and others
Defendant: The United States Army Corps of Engineers, The United States Army Corps of Engineers, John P. Woodley, Jr. and others
Intervenor Defendant: State Of Alabama, State Of Alabama, State Of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
as 3:2007cv00252
Plaintiff: State of Georgia and State of Georgia
Intervenor Plaintiff: Lake Lanier Association, Atlanta Regional Commission, Atlanta Regional Commission and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Preston M. Geren, John P. Woodley, Jr. and others
Intervenor Defendant: State Of Florida, State Of Florida, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rio Grande, et al v. Martinez, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-2399
Plaintiff - Appellee: RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW, Hybognathus amarus, SOUTHWESTERN WILLOW FLYCATCHER, (Empidonax trailii extimus), DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant - Appellee: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the United States, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lt. Gen., Chief Engineer, Army Corps of Engineers, JOSEPH BALLARD, General, Chief Engineer, Army Corps of Engineers and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellant: THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Defendant-Intervenor: STATE OF NEW MEXICO, RIO DE CHAMA ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION and CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: ALBUQUERQUE-BERNALILLO COUNTY WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY
Intervenor: CITY OF SANTA FE
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARIZONA, CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?