Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Schroeder v. United States Postal Service et al
as 7:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Schroeder
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Chavis v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
George Chavis
Defendant:
H. Kenneth Schroeder, S. Wenderlinch, J. Lamanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Hailee Paxton , Penny Ridley , Danna Salvaleon-Cua and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Does and Danielle Thate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2013cv06476
Plaintiff:
Paul Stuart Schroeder
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2013cv06300
Plaintiff:
Avis Hill
Defendant:
City of Rochester and Officer Jeff Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Schroeder et al
as 7:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sylvia T. Schroeder and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Schroeder v. Cohen et al
as 1:2012cv09413
Plaintiff:
Theodore F. Schroeder
Defendant:
Brian S. Cohen and Pinterest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Schroeder v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv03657
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Lee Nielsen, The City Of Long Beach Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schroeder et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carreen Schroeder and Matthew Schroeder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
