Cases 81 - 90 of 859
Jones v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
Quentin T. Jones
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilhelm v. Limelight Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Limelight Networks, Inc., Walter D. Amaral, Scott A. Genereux and others
Pottetti v. Springer et al
as 1:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Michael Pottetti
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Maggie Wilderotter, Blake J. Irving and others
Nominal Defendant:
Docusign, Inc.
Rogers et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
D'Andre R. Rogers, Evan T. Dayton, Jerry McGinnis and others
Defendant:
Warden Truman Mears, Deputy Warden John Beck, Major Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Coulbourne et al
as 1:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nelson T. Henry
Defendant:
Corporal Joshua Tate Coulbourne, Corporal Michael Kealty and Patrolman Dylan Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pardo v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erick Pardo
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T Boehm and others
Waverly Licensing LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Waverly Licensing LLC
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Brown et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Brown and Hardy T. Brown
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Majid v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Rahim B. Majid
Defendant:
Robert May, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Deputy Warden Phil Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. James T Vaughn Correctional Center
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Judeau S. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
James T Vaughn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
