Cases filed in California
Cases 81 - 90 of 399
Hewlett-Packard Company v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04116
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America and Quanta Display Inc.
3rd_party_defendant: Toshiba Corporation , Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. , Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and others
Movant: LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03856
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03763
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: CMO Japan Co., Ltd., NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff: T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02495
Plaintiff: Jaco Electronics, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02225
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant: CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Mitsui & Co. (Usa) Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Orinda Intellectual Properties USA Holding Group, Inc. v. Asustek Computer Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv02010
Plaintiff: Orinda Intellectual Properties USA Holding Group, Inc.
Defendant: Asustek Computer Inc. , Asus Computer International, Inc. , Audio Partnership PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01846
Not Yet Classified: Third Party Sony Mobile Communications USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Non-Party Rovi Corp. and others
Petitioner: InterDigital Technology Corporation, S3G Graphics Co. LTD., InterDigital Communications LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: Cellco Partnership and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Interested Party: Siemens AG and Microsoft Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: HTC Corporation
Intervenor: Research In Motion Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01656
Plaintiff: Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies Corp.
Defendant: Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00829
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc and others
Plaintiff: MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?