Cases 81 - 90 of 149
Mock v. Illinois, City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv03275
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mock
Defendant:
Illinois, City of Chicago Police Dept., A. Castro and Aaron Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03046
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cunningham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Dept. and Markee Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Walker v. Chicago Police Dept et al
as 1:2014cv02636
Plaintiff:
Johnny D. Walker
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept, Police Sgt., Merriweather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv01405
Plaintiff:
Eric Jenkins
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Thomas Dart and Cook County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Chicago v. Robert Winston
as 14-1371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT L. WINSTON
Appellant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Defendant:
OFFICER O'BRIEN, Chicago Police Dept Star #10634 and OFFICER YATES, Star #11586
Meyer v. Chicago Police Dept.
as 1:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Malone v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv08745
Plaintiff:
Jamell Olmstead Malone
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and Chicago Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Chicago, et al v. Robert Winston, et al
as 13-3553
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT J. WINSTON
Appellant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Defendant:
OFFICER O'BRIEN, Chicago Police Dept Star #10634 and OFFICER YATES, Star #11586
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv07441
Plaintiff:
Miracle Marcus Terrell Smith
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Dept., John Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
