Cases 81 - 90 of 4,347
WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon MorrallIn re: Brandon Morrall
as 24-11329
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON MORRALL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deandre Arnold v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10835
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, CHRIS CARR, REGINALD SCANDRETT and others
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birks v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Bobby D. Birks, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis and Tyrone Oliver
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
