Cases 81 - 90 of 747
Cochran Drywall v. Michigan Chapter Associate General Contractors of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14161
Plaintiff:
Cochran Drywall
Defendant:
Michigan Chapter Associate General Contractors of America, Inc. and Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Upper Peninsula
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. AGATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2015mc00049
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, CARPENTERS JOINT APPRENTICE COMMITTEE, CARPENTERS INTERNATIONAL TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
AGATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Detroit A & J Construction, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2015cv13517
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Detroit A & J Construction, L.L.C. and Amy Susalla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. SCHALER CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01237
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
TODD D SCHALER and SCHALER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Travco Interiors, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2015cv12443
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Travco Interiors, L.L.C. and Joseph L. Judge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Tishman Construction Corporation v. District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2015cv05217
Petitioner:
Tishman Construction Corporation
Respondent:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Pinnacle Industries II, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05214
Petitioner:
Pinnacle Industries II, LLC
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
DiFama Concrete, Inc. et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05209
Petitioner:
DiFama Concrete, Inc. and DFC Structures, LLC
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cross Country Construction et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05215
Petitioner:
Cross Country Construction , Roger & Sons Concrete, Inc. , Sorbara Construction Corp. and others
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Hudson Yards Construction LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05210
Petitioner:
Hudson Yards Construction LLC
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
