Cases 81 - 90 of 13,635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Grimes v. Camara et al
as 1:2024cv05643
Defendant:
sition, llc, oumar Camara, Taxifleet Management LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert N Grimes
Cross-Complainant:
Taxifleet Management LLC
Cross-Defendant:
sition, llc, oumar Camara and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Hertular v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05824
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robert Hertular
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Haynes v. The United States of America
as 5:2024cv00909
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gu v. Didonato et al
as 1:2024cv05179
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
ADA Vincent James Didonato, III and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05552
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robert Lenard Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vickers v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05765
Petitioner:
Nazeer Vickers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexandre v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05767
Petitioner:
Eddy Alexandre
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv05113
Defendant:
United States of America, Chat Mui Chan, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
