Cases 81 - 90 of 148
Ward v. Barber et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Defendant:
Officer Barber and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Widener v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Widener
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Fitzgerald v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 8:2013cv00422
Plaintiff:
Christel N. Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Malone v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03364
Plaintiff:
Dawn S. Malone
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores, Inc. and Salim and Brothers, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lewis v. Sam's Real Estate Business Trust et al
as 1:2012cv02962
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lewis
Defendant:
Sam's Real Estate Business Trust , Sam's East, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bosslet v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02392
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Bosslet
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Uppercue et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02105
Plaintiff:
Gretta Uppercue and William Uppercue
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solum et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01941
Plaintiff:
Susan Solum and Edward Solum
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rill et al v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
James M. Rill and Sherri L. Rill
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeJesus et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 8:2012cv01814
Plaintiff:
Mandy DeJesus and Angel DeJesus, II
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
