Cases 81 - 90 of 1,973
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Kendell D Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ashley D. Adams
Defendant:
E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin et al v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv00739
Defendant:
Jud Owens, Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company, Jud and others
Plaintiff:
Dena Martin and Roy D Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Berry v. Sharp
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Stacey D Berry
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee et al v. Hughes et al
as 6:2023cv00263
Defendant:
Jonathan D. Hughes, Johnathan D. Hughes, Superior Excavating, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mee Lee, Lia Lee and Thomas Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Quincy D Brown
Defendant:
CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections, FNU Brinton and FNU Does 2-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forsyth v. Abendigos et al
as 6:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Russell D. Forsyth
Defendant:
Abendigos and Hochatown Original, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
