Cases 81 - 90 of 991
Concepts Design Furniture, Inc., et al v. Fisher & Broyles LLP, et al
as 22-2303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONCEPTS DESIGN FURNITURE, INC., COMPTOIR DES INDES INC., DAVID QUAKNINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FISHER & BROYLES LLP, also known as FisherBroyles LLP and ALASTAIR J. WARR
Deere & Company v. Charles Martin, et al
as 22-2321
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEERE & COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES MARTIN, CURTIS MARTIN and BENNETT MACHINE & FABRICATING, INC.
Francine Kokenis v. Dmytro Kurywczak, et al
as 22-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCINE KOKENIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DMYTRO KURYWCZAK, B. GEORGE OLEKSIUK and B. GEORGE OLEKSIUK & ASSOCIATES, PC
Misty Traeger v. John Thomas, III, et al
as 22-2166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MISTY TRAEGER and MISTY DAWN TRAEGER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS, III, MELISSA BOERNSON and CHRISTINA BOERNSON
Meredith Dawson v. Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc., et al
as 22-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEREDITH D. DAWSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC. and GREAT LAKES HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION
Marquette University v. Kuali, Inc.
as 22-1370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
KUALI, INC.
Priest Butler v. Google, LLC, et al
as 22-2113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRIEST D. BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, YOUTUBE LLC and ALPHABET INC.
Joshua Johnson v. Mitek Systems, Inc.
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellant:
MITEK SYSTEMS, INC.
Elizabeth Peters v. Cassandra Haller, et al
as 22-1688
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH PETERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CASSANDRA HALLER, TIMOTHY SLOAN and DAVID M. ERICKSON
Nehemiah Rolle, Jr. v. Richard Creedon
as 22-1720
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEHEMIAH ROLLE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD P. CREEDON, CEO of Utica National Insurance Group, doing business as Founders Insurance Company in Des Plaines, Illinois
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
