Cases 81 - 90 of 2,177
Bosarge et al v. Edney et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bosarge, Jaquelyn Butler, Kimberly Harrell and others
Defendant:
Daniel P. Edney, Lynn Fitch, Ashley Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Hancock County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Steve Morales
Defendant:
Hancock County Sheriff's Department, Hancock County, Colin Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Divine et al v. Securix, LLC
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Amy Divine, Karl Merchant and Columbus Jones
Defendant:
Securix, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varaksa v. City of McComb et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Varaksa
Defendant:
City of McComb, McComb Police Department and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perry v. Jones County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perry
Defendant:
Jones County, Mississippi, Officer J.D. Carter, Officer Jeff Monk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Russell v. East Central Community College
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Marcia Russell
Defendant:
East Central Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Javarius Russell
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Sam Dobbins, Charles Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joiner v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Latoya Joiner
Defendant:
William King, Arthur James, Jeremy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. IRS
as 3:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
