Cases 81 - 90 of 189,119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Galvan v. EFT Express SA de CV et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Calvillo Galvan
Defendant:
EFT Express SA de CV and Hipolito Hernandez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rpgers and Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Texas Children's Hospital
as 4:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Mary Perry
Defendant:
Texas Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris et al v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris and Maria Harris
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01614
Plaintiff:
Sean Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Clarke v. RHL Reederei Hamburger Lloyd GmbH & Co. KG et al
as 4:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Richard Clarke
Defendant:
RHL Reederei Hamburger Lloyd GmbH & Co. KG and Hapag-Lloyd AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sewell v. PAM Transport, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Ladarian Sewell
Defendant:
PAM Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
