Cases 81 - 90 of 80,618
Murdock et al v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC., et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Robert Murdock and Kimberly Murdock
Defendant:
HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC.,, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N.V., and HAL Antillen N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flanagan v. Johnston et al
as 3:2024cv05313
Plaintiff:
Martha Marie Flanagan
Defendant:
Kelly R Johnston, Stacey R Denham, A Hitchcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirsila et al v. Pierce County
as 3:2024cv05314
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kirsila and Otis Williams
Defendant:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Key Tronic Corporation v. Clean Air Group Inc
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Key Tronic Corporation
Defendant:
Clean Air Group Inc a Delaware corporation doing business as AtmosAir Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gage v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Cody Gage
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McGary et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mr Darnell McGary and Ms Elizabeth McGary
Defendant:
Mr Jay Inslee, Susan Dryfus, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
