Cases 1 - 10 of 2,005
McGovern et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant:
William Bailey and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGovern et al v. William et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant:
Bailey William and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGovern et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
David M. McGovern and Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F.
Defendant:
William Bailey, III and Town of Tiverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Li v. Su et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Bing Hong Li
Defendant:
Ming Ming Su, Patrick Li, US Department of States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Estime v. An
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Juliana Estime
Defendant:
Kenneth An
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jensen v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Justyna Jensen
Defendant:
Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission and Kimberly Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. Providence Police Department
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Providence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
