Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hummel et al v. Boise School District et al
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hummel, Amy Hummel and C H
Defendant:
Boise School District, Fairmont Junior High and Christopher Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowman v. City of Boise City, et al.
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Bowman
Defendant:
City of Boise City, City of Boise Police Department, Lauren McLean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Strayer et al v. Idaho State Patrol et al
as 2:2020cv00450
Defendant:
Trooper Michael Archer, Idaho State Patrol, Deputy Sheriff Samuel Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Edward M Hodge, Amy E Strayer and Morgan J Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Bergstrom v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Plaintiff:
Christina Bergstrom and Stacie Dye
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, John/Jane Does, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram et al v. Mouser et al
as 1:2019cv00308
Plaintiff:
Felisha Ingram, Dustin Ingram, Z. I. and others
Defendant:
Katie Mouser, St. Lukes, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ocampo v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Lance Gordan Ocampo
Defendant:
Corizon LLC , Dianna Collins, Amy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
