Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Caldwell v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv04019
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Caldwell
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Kelley Garcia, Marissa Eyanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parker v. Greater Regional Health et al
as 4:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Darla Parker
Defendant:
Greater Regional Health, Monte Neizel, Amy Rieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Helm v. Sons of Silence MC, The et al
as 2:2020cv01033
Defendant:
Scott Mcdermott, Courier, The, Kate Riley and others
Plaintiff:
True Vision Tattoos and Fine Arts LLC, Jacob Curtis Allen Helm and Green City Custom Tattoos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bloomfield v. Scott County, Minnesota et al
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Otoe County Nebraska, Christian Volter, Scott County, Minnesota and others
Plaintiff:
Brian E Bloomfield and Brian E Bloomfield, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Lennette v. Siver et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lennette
Defendant:
Melody Siver , Amy Howell , Valerie Lovaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
