Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Griffin v. Gualtieri
as 8:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PACE
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDY PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Klucznik et al
as 8:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thomas Lawrence
Defendant:
Major Shaun Klucznik, Captain Andy Batchelder, Lieutenant Daniel Carriveau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Andy Franklin
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Brazier et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Andy Thomas
Defendant:
James Brazier, Officer Downs, Officer Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Wiley et al
as 8:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Corporal Wiley, Deputy Statsny, Corporal Brinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Automotaion Personal Services et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Andy T. Sanford
Defendant:
Automotaion Personal Services and Russell Forest Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Russell Forest Products Inc.
as 5:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Andy Tyrone Sanford
Defendant:
Russell Forest Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
