Cases 1 - 10 of 44
WALKER et al v. HESTER et al
as 5:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Devin Anthony Walker and Dawdrell Ray
Defendant:
ANDY HESTER, Mike Hall and City of Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and Warden JOHN CROW, III
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Warden JOHN CROW, III, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLEY v. BOSTICK et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
NURSE MANDY BOSTICK, SHERIFF ANDY HESTER and SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, et al.
as 7:2020cv00121
Defendant:
BILLY J WHEELER, HUDSON DURDEN, TIM CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ARNELO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATHENS CELLULAR INC v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00001
Defendant:
PATRICK DAVENPORT, RUSSELL EDWARDS, TIM DENSON and others
Plaintiff:
ATHENS CELLULAR INC and ATHENS CELLULAR INC doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILES v. HESTER et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN GEORGE GILES
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC, AMBER CROSS, TURNER COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEHERRIN ARGICULTURAL & CHEMICAL COMPANY v. ANDY SPARROW FARMS INC et al
as 5:2018cv00221
Defendant:
ANDY SPARROW FARMS INC and WILLIAM ANDREW SPARROW
Plaintiff:
MEHERRIN ARGICULTURAL & CHEMICAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
