Cases 1 - 10 of 1,505
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANAGER HILGEN, WILLIE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW OFFICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01958
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and GREENTREE MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOAN DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MEL STEIN REALTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
