Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mather v. Cody Regional Health Center Inc Physician et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Natalie A Mather
Defendant:
MD Stephanie Knodel, RN Gena, RN Megan Maus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moffat v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00255
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Moffat
Petitioner:
Connie Jean Moffat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mesa-Barria et al v. United States of America President et al
as 2:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Elias Enoc Mesa-Barria and Connie Howell-Mesa
Defendant:
United States of America President, United States Attorney General, United States Executive Office of Immigration Review Board Member and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neeley et al v. Ulmer
as 2:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michiel Neeley and Connie Neeley
Defendant:
Donald R Ulmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Langille et al v. Transco Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Connie Langille and Paul E Langille
Defendant:
Transco Inc and Keith Peter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Riedel et al
as 2:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Connie Harmon
Defendant:
Jody Riedel and Tania J Riedel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hatfield v. Miller et al
as 2:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kim L Hatfield
Defendant:
Connie Miller, Jerry Post, Psy.D., PC and Post Consulting PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
