Cases 1 - 10 of 11,145
MIRUMILOVNY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LLC v. Cherry et al
as 0:2024cv60827
Plaintiff:
MIRUMILOVNY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
Tame Cherry, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Boris Roger Erickson
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, County of Pinellas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Gagosian et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mario Montanez
Defendant:
Steve Gagosian, Troy Stpiette and John/Jane Doe
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Rasier (FL), LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
jane doe
Defendant:
Rasier (FL), LLC, Rasier, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
