Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv00825
Defendant:
Daniel Stover, Assist. Warden M. Feazell, Warden FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westerby v. Paton et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Defendant:
FNU Williams, FNU Smith, Ken Paton and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Westerby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Well Path et al
as 6:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Perlinger, FNU McReynolds, FNU Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Artavias Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Rogers v. Rusty Hierholzer, et al
as 20-50105
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSTY HIERHOLZER, Kerr County Sheriff, DR. FNU SMITH, Kerr County Jail Doctor and SYLVIA FORAKER, Kerr County Jail Administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL ROGERS
Parrott v. UTMB Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 1:2019cv00475
Defendant:
FNU Smith, Edward Deleon, V Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Mark Parrott, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Rogers v. Rusty Hierholzer, et al
as 19-50870
Defendant / Appellee:
RUSTY HIERHOLZER, Kerr County Sheriff, DR. FNU SMITH, Kerr County Jail Doctor and SYLVIA FORAKER, Kerr County Jail Administrator
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL ROGERS
Moses v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2018cv01302
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Bexar County, FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2018cv00970
Defendant:
Craig Peters, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. McCann's et al
as 6:2018cv00465
Defendant:
FNU Warren, Kenny McCann's, Fnu Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. McCann's et al
as 1:2018cv00749
Defendant:
Kenny McCann's, Captain FNU Smith, ., Captain FNU Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
