Cases 31 - 40 of 1,796
Doe v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20344
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Burlington Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Minerva Curtis
Defendant:
Burlington Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Doe (A.K.) v. MSC CRUISES S.A.
as 1:2024cv20276
Defendant:
MSC CRUISES S.A., MSC CRUISES S.A. CO. and MSC CRUISES (USA) INC.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (A.K.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Doe (A.K.) v. MSC CRUISES S.A.
as 1:2024cv20277
Defendant:
MSC CRUISES S.A., MSC CRUISES S.A. CO. and MSC CRUISES (USA) INC.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (A.K.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. LAVORADO et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
M LAVORADO, DAIQUIRI DUNCAN, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Reddish et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Elijah Tamar Bowden
Defendant:
Reddish, Lester Fernandez, H.L. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
