Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Doe v. Xenia Community Safety Corp et al
as 3:2023cv02734
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Mary Doe
Defendant:
Xenia Community Safety Corp, Jesse Goff, Jerry Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bull v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jayson Bull
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., John D. Lakin, County of Madison, Illinois and others
Intervenor:
Angie Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. St. Clair County et al
as 3:2018cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
St. Clair County, Richard Watson and Robert Sneed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. City of Columbia, Illinois et al
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Carla Edwards
Defendant:
City of Columbia, Illinois and John and Jane Doe Public Employees 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. East St. Louis et al
as 3:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis , Ramone Carpenter and Christopher Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Sobeck et al
as 3:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Sobeck , Cynthia Broskie and H Group BBT, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jane Doe 77 v. Massac Unit School District #1 et al
as 3:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 77
Defendant:
Massac Unit School District #1 , William Hatfield , Donald Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
