Cases 1 - 10 of 18
GLAZEWSKI v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2023cv03948
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUHAMMAD v. SAMUAH et al
as 3:2018cv16284
Defendant:
OLIVIA SAMUAH, DOCTOR JOHN MOE TWO, RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. PLOUSIS et al
as 2:2018cv11224
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant:
JOHNDOE, LOPEZ, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAGG v. MEO et al
as 2:2017cv05056
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
FRANCIS MEO and NURSES JANE ROES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2014cv05095
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES and JANICE JACKSON
Defendant:
ANGEL SANTIAGO, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICER 1-10, JANE ROE SUPERVISOR 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARUSO v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv05837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARUSO
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CHARLES ALBINO, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNOLLY v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2013cv02203
Plaintiff:
DAVID CASTRO CONNOLLY
Defendant:
ROY HENDRICKS, ALFARO ORTIZ, JOHN DOES, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLAZEWSKI v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2011cv07160
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
EVELYN DAVIS, JOSEPH P. WYERS, LISA SCHOFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOHSFIELD v. POLHEMUS et al
as 3:2011cv03007
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOHSFIELD
Defendant:
WILLIAM POLHEMUS, THEODORE HUTLER, JOHN DOE(S) 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
KENDRA DENISE BROWN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, LT. "JOHN" RODAWICZ, DR. "JOHN" JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
