Cases 11 - 20 of 46
RICHARDSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01902
Petitioner:
JESSICA RICHARDSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BROWN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01863
Petitioner:
JESSICA BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
KENNEDY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01812
Petitioner:
JESSICA KENNEDY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ACUNA et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01758
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. ACUNA, JESUS E. AGUIRRE, MIGUEL ALCALA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FISCHER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01727
Petitioner:
JESSICA FISCHER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MorrisIn re: Morris
as 23-1015
Appellant:
In re: JESSICA MORRIS, GLENN RIGGS, AMY DALEY and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
HAMPTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01283
Petitioner:
JESSICA HAMPTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SUH v. USA
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
JESSICA SUH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GARZA v. USA
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
JESSICA GARZA
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
