Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holt v. Hull et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Warren Holt
Defendant:
Ted Hull, Jessica Middlebrook and Hannah Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jenkins v. RSW Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Jessica Jenkins
Respondent:
RSW Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Koby Chavez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company v. Mendenhall
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jessica Mendenhall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
