Cases 11 - 20 of 1,135
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
Jimmy Hindman v. John Doe, et al
as 24-5311
Plaintiff:
JIMMY DOYLE HINDMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Unknown Federal Prison Guard in Memphis, TN, ANGELA M. OWENS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Tom Djonovic, et al v. Carol Septer, et al
as 24-1284
Plaintiff:
TOM DJONOVIC and JOHN P. KELMENDI
Defendant:
CAROL SEPTER, Code Enforcement Officer, GUARESIMO, Shelby Township, MI Police Officer, JOHN DOE, 2 & 3, Shelby Township, MI Police Officers and others
Jaquan Lee v. Heath Underwood, et al
as 24-3271
Plaintiff:
JAQUAN LEE
Defendant:
HEATH UNDERWOOD, AARON BUSHEY, DAVID SCHEURER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe v. Brian Spencer, et al
as 24-5251
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BRIAN SPENCER and FICTITIOUS PERSONS 1-10
Jay Waller v. Michael Burgess, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTHONY WALLER
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL BURGESS, Personal capacity, THOMAS PARISH, Former Warden personal capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFREY CLOUSE, Personal Capacity and others
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Kevin Burke v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 24-3222
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. BURKE
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, EMMA COLLINS, Warden, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
