Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Johnston v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00128
Petitioner:
John Doe and Andrew J Johnston
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doe v. Cozzens et al
as 2:2019cv01596
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Nicole Donovan, Unknown Borquez and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States of America, Louis Winn, Jr., LA Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. Doe et al
as 2:2014cv02455
Plaintiff:
Armando Garcia De La Cruz
Defendant:
John Doe, R Glas, S Ricotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montoya v. Ryan et al
as 4:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
Henry Enrique Montoya, Jr
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Jeffrey Freeland, B Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. ADOC et al
as 2:2009cv01426
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Schmidt
Defendant:
ADOC, McDonald, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Townsel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilkinson v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
Scott Wilkinson
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Bennie H Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01253
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Emerson
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio, John Doe, Maricopa County Jail Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dias v. Frank et al
as 2:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
John Dias
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
