Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tidriri v. The Board of Regents et al
as 4:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Moulay Tidriri
Defendant:
The Board of Regents, Iowa State University, Mary Vermeer Andringa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Spengler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Seterus Inc., Sheri Wofford, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Spengler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzsimmons v. United States
as 3:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dan Schaefer v. Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, LLC
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Dan Schaefer and Maureen Schaefer
Defendant:
Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzsimmons v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice, State of California Judicial Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fitzsimmons v. Wagner et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
John C Wagner and Aljazeera America
Cause Of Action: Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Fitzsimmons v. USA, et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States of America and United Arab Emirates
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Heins v. Young et al
as 4:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Defendant:
Joseph Young, John Burns, John Courter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
