Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Royal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02617
Plaintiff:
Sarah Royal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Archer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tamara Archer
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Sarah Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sarah Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Terry v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Sarah Mae Terry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Caproon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv22482
Plaintiff:
Sarah Catherine Caproon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Royal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01641
Plaintiff:
Sarah Royal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez v. Commissioner Social Security
as 6:2018cv02213
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv01604
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
