Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Weber v. Palin
as 3:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
Arno Weber
Defendant:
Sarah Palin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royal et al v. Palin
as 3:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gregory Charles Royal and Kim Chatman
Defendant:
Sarah Palin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc. v. Palin et al
as 3:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc., Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc. and Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc.
Defendant:
Sarah Palin, Larry Ledoux, The Alaska Department of Education and Early Development and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Askoak v. United States of America, Dept. of Health & Human Services
as 4:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Sarah Askoak
Defendant:
United States of America Dept of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Weber v Palin
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Arno Weber
Defendant:
Sarah Palin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weber v. Palin
as 3:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Arno Weber
Defendant:
Sarah Palin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quarton et al v. Borgeson & Burns, P.C.
as 3:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
Colin Quarton and Sarah Quarton
Defendant:
Borgeson & Burns, P.C., Roger Franklin, Ronald Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Drews v. Begich et al
as 3:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Lynne Drews
Defendant:
Mark Begich, Sarah Palin, Child Protective Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jack v. State of Alaska Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Berry L. Jack
Defendant:
State of Alaska Dept of Corrections, State of Alaska, Sarah Palin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jack v. Palin et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Berry Jack
Defendant:
Sarah Palin and Debbie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
