Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. et al v. Parson et al
as 2:2019cv04155
Defendant:
MD, FACP Marc K Taormina, DO James A DiRenna, Jeffrey S Glaser and others
Plaintiff:
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. and DO, MSCI, FACOG Colleen P. McNicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2018mc09004
Plaintiff:
Cadence Education, LLC
Defendant:
J. Brandon Vore, Sarah Vore and FHD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type:
Other Statutes
Cadence Education, Inc. v. Vore, et al.
as 4:2018mc00252
Defendant:
James L. Vore , Patricia Vore , J. Brandon Vore and others
Plaintiff:
Cadence Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Givens v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
as 4:2017cv02811
Plaintiff:
Sarah Givens
Defendant:
Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Engel v. Forhetz et al
as 6:2017cv03286
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Ethan Forhetz, Sarah Forhetz, Emily Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. KY3 News of Springfield, Missouri et al
as 3:2017cv05217
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
KY3 News of Springfield, Missouri, Ethan Forhetz, Sarah Forhetz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. KY3, et al
as 3:2017cv05158
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
KY3 News, Ethan Forhetz, Sarah Forhetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Engel v. KY3 News et al
as 3:2017cv05160
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
KY3 News, KSPR News, KOLR News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
