Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Levesque v. Storie et al
as 4:2024cv40083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Gregory P Storie, Letitia James, Julia Kaplan Toce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchenay et al v. Hologic, Inc.
as 1:2023cv12458
Plaintiff:
Melissa Blanchenay, Sheila Boisvert, Kim Horn and others
Defendant:
Hologic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Kelly
as 1:2023cv12046
Petitioner:
Heriberto Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ainooson v. O'Gara et al
as 1:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Justice E. Ainooson
Defendant:
James O'Gara, Sheila C Kelly, Joann Lynds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coupal v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11291
Plaintiff:
Sheila Coupal
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jewell v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10045
Plaintiff:
Sheila Jewell
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien Ltd., Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
